Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (SPECT)⁹⁹ᵐTc-sestamibi / tetrofosmin · ²⁰¹Tl
Stress/rest gated SPECT MPI with Tc-99m agents or thallium-201
Quick Answer
SPECT MPI compares myocardial tracer uptake at stress versus rest to detect ischemia (reversible defect) and infarct (fixed defect). Tc-99m-sestamibi or tetrofosmin are the usual agents; ECG-gating simultaneously yields LVEF, volumes, and wall motion. Stress is by exercise or a pharmacologic vasodilator/agent. Attenuation correction (CT or prone imaging) reduces artifacts.
Clinical Importance
SPECT MPI is a workhorse for evaluating stable chest pain, risk-stratifying known/suspected CAD, and assessing myocardium after revascularization. Normal MPI carries a low annual event rate; increasing defect burden predicts higher risk.
Patient Preparation
- Hold caffeine and methylxanthines ~12–24 h before vasodilator stress (they block adenosine receptors and blunt hyperemia).
- Hold nitrates and, per protocol, some anti-ischemics for diagnostic studies.
- NPO per local policy; diabetic-medication and glucose management for gated accuracy.
- Confirm no contraindication to the chosen stress agent.
Protocols (common variants)
- Same-day rest/stress or stress/rest (Tc-99m agents).
- Two-day stress/rest for larger patients (higher activity, better counts).
- Stress-first / stress-only — if stress is normal with good-quality gating and attenuation correction, rest imaging may be omitted (lower dose).
- Dual-isotope (Tl-201 rest + Tc-99m stress) — less used now due to dose.
Acquisition
Gated SPECT ~15–60 min after stress and rest injections (timing agent-dependent). Supine ± prone or upright imaging; CT attenuation correction where available. Ensure adequate counts and correct gating.
Processing
Reconstruct short-axis, vertical and horizontal long-axis slices; generate polar (bull's-eye) maps; quantify perfusion (summed scores) and function (LVEF, EDV/ESV, TID). Compare stress and rest datasets.
Interpretation
Normal Findings
Homogeneous tracer uptake throughout the left ventricle at stress and rest, normal wall motion/thickening, normal LVEF, no TID.
Abnormal Findings
- Reversible defect (present at stress, resolves at rest) → ischemia.
- Fixed defect (present at stress and rest) → infarct/scar.
- Partially reversible → mixed scar and peri-infarct ischemia.
- High-risk markers: large/multiterritory ischemia, TID, post-stress LV dysfunction, increased lung uptake (Tl-201).
Attenuation correction & artifact mitigation
Soft-tissue attenuation is the commonest source of false-positive defects, so most labs use one or more corrections:
- CT-based attenuation correction (SPECT/CT): the reference method; watch for CT–emission misregistration.
- Prone imaging: shifts the diaphragm and reduces inferior-wall attenuation (breast attenuation may improve or worsen).
- Upright / two-position imaging and dedicated cardiac cameras (CZT) improve counts and reduce artifact.
- ECG gating is the great disambiguator: preserved wall motion/thickening in an apparent fixed defect points to attenuation artifact rather than scar.
Stress-only / stress-first imaging
A stress-first protocol images stress before rest; if the stress study is unequivocally normal with good-quality gating and attenuation correction, the rest acquisition can be omitted (stress-only) — cutting radiation dose and scanner time roughly in half. It requires confidence in image quality and is best in lower-pretest-probability patients.
Quality checks that change interpretation
Confirm adequate counts, absence of significant patient motion, correct ECG gating (arrhythmia degrades gated EF), and no subdiaphragmatic (bowel/liver) activity overlapping the inferior wall. Increased lung uptake (thallium) and a dilated post-stress cavity (TID) are high-risk signs read off the same images.
Stress vs rest, and the two questions gating rescues
SPECT MPI compares tracer uptake at stress vs rest: a reversible defect (present at stress, resolves at rest) means ischemia; a fixed defect (present at both) means infarct/scar. ECG gating is the great disambiguator — preserved wall motion/thickening in an apparent fixed defect points to attenuation artifact, not scar — and it simultaneously yields LVEF, volumes, and TID. Grade extent and severity; don't stop at "abnormal."
Dose-sparing and the artifacts that fool you
A stress-first / stress-only protocol images stress before rest and, if the stress study is unequivocally normal with good gating and attenuation correction, omits the rest acquisition — roughly halving dose and scanner time, best in lower-pretest-probability patients. The commonest false-positive source is soft-tissue attenuation (breast anteriorly, diaphragm inferiorly), mitigated by CT attenuation correction (watch CT–emission misregistration), prone/upright imaging, and gating. And always screen for caffeine/methylxanthines (~12–24 h hold) before vasodilator stress — they blunt hyperemia and cause false negatives — plus balanced multivessel ischemia that can look falsely uniform (watch TID, post-stress LV dysfunction, thallium lung uptake).
Attenuation artifact vs true defect
The single most-tested SPECT skill — separating a soft-tissue artifact from real scar:
| Feature | Attenuation artifact | True infarct/scar |
|---|---|---|
| Classic locations | Breast (anterior/anterolateral, ♀); diaphragm (inferior, ♂/obese) | Any coronary territory |
| Reversibility | Fixed (present rest + stress) | Fixed |
| Gated wall motion/thickening | Preserved (the key discriminator) | Reduced |
| Response to correction | Improves with CT-AC / prone imaging | Persists |
| Balanced multivessel clue | — | Watch TID, lung uptake, post-stress LV dysfunction |
High-Yield Pearls
- Grade the study — extent and severity (summed scores) matter more than a binary "abnormal."
- Gating rescues interpretation: preserved wall motion in a fixed apparent defect suggests attenuation artifact, not scar.
Common Pitfalls
- Attenuation artifacts: breast (anterior) and diaphragm (inferior) mimic defects — use attenuation correction, prone imaging, and gating to distinguish.
- Balanced ischemia in multivessel disease can look falsely uniform on relative SPECT — watch for TID, LV dysfunction, and consider PET flow.
- Caffeine before vasodilator stress → false-negative for ischemia.
- Motion and subdiaphragmatic (bowel/liver) activity artifacts.
Reporting
State protocol/agent/stress type, image quality and attenuation correction, perfusion (location, size, severity, reversibility with summed scores), gated LVEF/volumes, TID, and an integrated risk impression. See the cardiac reporting page.
Self-Check
Q1. Distinguish a reversible from a fixed defect and what each means.
Answer: Reversible (present at stress, resolves at rest) = ischemia; fixed (present at both) = infarct/scar.
Q2. An apparent fixed inferior defect shows preserved wall motion/thickening on gated images. Interpretation?
Answer: Preserved motion points to attenuation artifact, not scar — gating is the great disambiguator.
Q3. When can the rest acquisition be omitted (stress-only), and what does it save?
Answer: When the stress study is unequivocally normal with good gating and attenuation correction (best in lower-pretest-probability patients) — roughly halving dose and scanner time.
Q4. A relative SPECT looks uniform but the patient has multivessel disease. What high-risk clues might you still see?
Answer: Balanced ischemia can look uniform — watch TID, post-stress LV dysfunction, and thallium lung uptake (and consider PET flow).
Key References
- ASNC imaging guidelines for SPECT MPI acquisition, processing, and interpretation.
- SNMMI procedure standard for myocardial perfusion imaging.
Evidence & sources
https://nuc.med/mpi-spect/ Report an issue