F-18-FES (Fluoroestradiol)¹⁸F-fluoroestradiol
Whole-body PET imaging of estrogen-receptor expression
Quick Answer
F-18-fluoroestradiol (FES) binds the estrogen receptor (ER), phenotyping ER expression across all lesions in a single whole-body PET. It is FDA-approved as an adjunct for detecting ER-positive lesions in recurrent/metastatic breast cancer, resolving heterogeneous or biopsy-inaccessible disease and informing endocrine-therapy decisions. Two facts define its use: recent ER-blocking therapy causes false negatives, and intense hepatobiliary excretion makes it unreliable for hepatic lesions.
Mechanism
FES (16α-[¹⁸F]fluoroestradiol) binds the estrogen receptor with high affinity; regional uptake correlates with ER expression measured by immunohistochemistry. Because it competes for the receptor, agents that occupy or down-regulate ER (tamoxifen, fulvestrant) block FES binding.
Biodistribution
Hepatobiliary metabolism and excretion produce intense liver and bowel activity (limiting hepatic-lesion assessment). Physiologic uterine uptake occurs in premenopausal patients; blood-pool and renal clearance are also seen.
Clinical Indications
- Confirming ER expression in metastatic/recurrent breast cancer — especially heterogeneous or biopsy-inaccessible disease.
- Endocrine-therapy planning — predicting benefit and clarifying discordant biopsy results.
- Whole-body ER phenotyping when a single biopsy cannot represent all lesions.
Protocol Notes
- Typical adult activity ~6 mCi (222 MBq); uptake ~60–80 min.
- Hold ER-blocking therapy appropriately (tamoxifen/fulvestrant cause false negatives) — timing is protocol-dependent.
- Standard PET/CT acquisition; report reference regions and SUV of index lesions.
Interpretation Highlights
- Lesion uptake above blood pool/background indicates ER expression; correlate with sites of known disease.
- Discordance (FDG-positive but FES-negative) can flag ER-loss/heterogeneity relevant to endocrine-therapy decisions.
- Not for hepatic lesions (physiologic liver/bowel activity).
Reporting Checklist
- Confirm ER-blocking drugs were held appropriately (timing) — the key false-negative source.
- Report ER-avidity by lesion, capturing heterogeneity.
- Note the hepatobiliary limitation for liver lesions.
- Correlate with FDG/anatomic imaging and receptor history.
Common Pitfalls
- Imaging during active ER-blocking therapy → false negatives.
- Liver/bowel physiologic activity obscuring adjacent/hepatic lesions.
- Over-interpreting low uptake in inherently ER-low/negative histologies.
Board Pearls
F-18-FES binds the estrogen receptor, phenotyping ER expression across every lesion in one whole-body PET — capturing heterogeneity or discordance a single biopsy misses and informing endocrine-therapy decisions.
Recent ER-targeting therapy (tamoxifen/fulvestrant) occupies the receptor and causes false negatives — hold per protocol; intense hepatobiliary excretion makes FES unreliable for hepatic lesions.
FES is most useful when disease is biopsy-inaccessible or heterogeneous, or when discordant biopsy/response raises the question of ER loss. Uptake correlates with ER IHC, so a genuinely ER-negative lesion is expected to be FES-low — the value is in mapping the distribution of ER across the whole body, not diagnosing the primary.
Related Pages
- Disease: Breast cancer (FES role by setting); tracer: FDG (paired phenotyping).
- Pitfalls: Pearls, pitfalls & normal variants.
Figure / Diagram Suggestions
- An ER-binding mechanism cartoon with the ER-blocker false-negative.
- A whole-body ER heterogeneity teaching plate (FES vs FDG discordance).
Self-Check
Q1. A patient on fulvestrant has a negative FES-PET. Does this prove ER-negativity?
Answer: No — the ER blocker occupies the receptor, causing a false negative; timing relative to endocrine therapy must be managed.
Q2. Why is FES unreliable for evaluating liver metastases?
Answer: Intense hepatobiliary excretion produces high physiologic liver/bowel activity that obscures hepatic lesions.
Q3. What is the principal clinical value of FES over a single biopsy?
Answer: It phenotypes ER expression across all lesions at once, capturing heterogeneity/discordance a single biopsy cannot represent.
Q4. What does an FDG-positive / FES-negative lesion suggest?
Answer: Possible ER loss/heterogeneity in a metabolically active lesion — relevant to whether endocrine therapy will control it.
Evidence & sources
https://nuc.med/fes/ Report an issue